Back to GalleryBack

Model Comparison

olmo-3.1-32b-instructvsclaude-opus-4.6

Model Comparison

Compare performance, benchmarks, and characteristics

olmo-3.1-32b-instruct

openrouter

Context65536 tokens

Input Price$0.2 / 1M tokens

Output Price$0.6 / 1M tokens

View Details →

claude-opus-4.6

anthropic

Context200K tokens

Input Price$5 / 1M tokens

Output Price$25 / 1M tokens

View Details →

Loading comparison...

Model Comparison

Metric	olmo-3.1-32b-instruct openrouter	claude-opus-4.6 anthropic
Pricing
Input Price	$0.2 / 1M tokens	$5 / 1M tokens
Output Price	$0.6 / 1M tokens	$25 / 1M tokens
Capabilities
Context Window	65536 tokens	200K tokens
Capabilities	tools	tools, reasoning
Input type	text	text, image
Category Scores
Overall Average	25.8	60.6
Science	45.0	78.1
Writing	24.5	55.0
Academia	33.0	68.8
Marketing	20.9	53.4
Programming	5.6	47.6
Benchmark Tests
HLE	4.9	18.6
GPQA	53.9	91.3
SciCode	16.7	45.7
AA Coding Index	5.6	47.6
AAII	12.0	46.4

olmo-3.1-32b-instruct Advantages

• Lower input token cost ($0.2 / 1M tokens vs $5 / 1M tokens)

claude-opus-4.6 Advantages

• Higher benchmark scores (60.6 vs 25.8)
• Larger context window (200K tokens vs 65536 tokens)

Compare openrouter/olmo-3.1-32b-instruct vs anthropic/claude-opus-4.6