Back to GalleryBack
Model Comparison
Model Comparison
Compare performance, benchmarks, and characteristics
claude-opus-4.6
anthropic
Context200K tokens
Input Price$5 / 1M tokens
Output Price$25 / 1M tokens
Loading comparison...
Model Comparison
| Metric |  |  |
|---|---|---|
Pricing | ||
| Input Price | $5 / 1M tokens | $0.1 / 1M tokens |
| Output Price | $25 / 1M tokens | $0.1 / 1M tokens |
Capabilities | ||
| Context Window | 200K tokens | 128K tokens |
| Capabilities | tools, reasoning | tools |
| Input type | text, image | text |
Category Scores | ||
| Overall Average | 60.6 | 0.0 |
| Science | 78.1 | N/A |
| Writing | 55.0 | N/A |
| Academia | 68.8 | N/A |
| Marketing | 53.4 | N/A |
| Programming | 47.6 | N/A |
Benchmark Tests | ||
| HLE | 18.6 | _ |
| GPQA | 91.3 | _ |
| SciCode | 45.7 | _ |
| AA Coding Index | 47.6 | _ |
| AAII | 46.4 | _ |
claude-opus-4.6 Advantages
- • Higher benchmark scores (60.6 vs 0.0)
- • Larger context window (200K tokens vs 128K tokens)
glm-4-32b Advantages
- • Lower input token cost ($0.1 / 1M tokens vs $5 / 1M tokens)