A simple aggregator server that allows batching multiple MCP tool calls into a single request, reducing token usage and network overhead for AI agents.
Batch multiple MCP tool calls into a single "batch_execute" request—reducing overhead and token usage for AI agents.
⚠️ NOTICE: Work in Progress
This project is actively being developed to address several complex challenges:
- Maintaining backwards compatibility with existing MCP servers
- Resolving transport complexities with multi-connection clients (Cline, Roo, Claude Desktop)
- Creating a beginner-friendly implementation
While functional, expect ongoing improvements and changes as we refine the solution.
MCP BatchIt is a simple aggregator server in the Model Context Protocol (MCP) ecosystem. It exposes just one tool: batch_execute
. Rather than calling multiple MCP tools (like fetch
, read_file
, create_directory
, write_file
, etc.) in separate messages, you can batch them together in one aggregator request.
This dramatically reduces token usage, network overhead, and repeated context in your AI agent or LLM conversation.
One Action per Message Problem: Normally, an LLM or AI agent can only call a single MCP tool at a time, forcing multiple calls for multi-step tasks.
Excessive Round Trips: 10 separate file operations might require 10 messages → 10 responses.
BatchIt’s Approach:
batch_execute
request.maxConcurrent
.stopOnError
is true, it halts new sub-ops.Single “Batch Execute” Tool
Parallel Execution
maxConcurrent
.Timeout & Stop on Error
timeoutMs
, and you can skip remaining ops if one fails.Connection Caching
git clone https://github.com/ryanjoachim/mcp-batchit.git cd mcp-batchit npm install npm run build npm start
BatchIt starts on STDIO by default so your AI agent (or any MCP client) can spawn it. For example:
mcp-batchit is running on stdio. Ready to batch-execute!
You can now send JSON-RPC requests (tools/call
method, name= "batch_execute"
) to it.
Using Cline/Roo Code, you can build a framework of contextual project documentation by leveraging the powerful "Memory Bank" custom instructions developed by Nick Baumann.
View Memory Bank Documentation
Total: ~19 separate API calls (13 operations + 6 response waits)
When working with complex multi-step tasks that depend on real-time output (such as reading files and generating documentation), you'll need to handle the process in distinct phases. This is necessary because BatchIt doesn't support data passing between sub-operations within the same request.
In this initial phase, we gather information from the filesystem by reading necessary files (e.g., package.json
, README.md
). This is accomplished through a batch_execute call to the filesystem MCP server:
{ "targetServer": { "name": "filesystem", "serverType": { "type": "filesystem", "config": { "rootDirectory": "C:/Users/Chewy/Documents/GitHub/ryanjoachim/mcp-batchit" } }, "transport": { "type": "stdio", "command": "cmd.exe", "args": [ "/c", "npx", "-y", "@modelcontextprotocol/server-filesystem", "C:/Users/Chewy/Documents/GitHub/ryanjoachim/mcp-batchit" ] } }, "operations": [ { "tool": "read_file", "arguments": { "path": "C:/Users/Chewy/Documents/GitHub/ryanjoachim/mcp-batchit/package.json" } }, { "tool": "read_file", "arguments": { "path": "C:/Users/Chewy/Documents/GitHub/ryanjoachim/mcp-batchit/README.md" } } ], "options": { "maxConcurrent": 2, "stopOnError": true, "timeoutMs": 30000 } }
Note: The aggregator spawns @modelcontextprotocol/server-filesystem
(via npx
) to execute parallel read_file
operations.
This phase involves processing outside the aggregator, typically using LLM or AI agent capabilities:
src
This step utilizes Roo Code's list_code_definition_names
tool, which is exclusively available to LLMs. However, note that many MCP servers can provide similar functionality, making it possible to complete this process without LLM requests.
The final phase combines data from previous steps (file contents and code definitions) to generate documentation in the memory-bank
directory:
{ "targetServer": { "name": "filesystem", "serverType": { "type": "filesystem", "config": { "rootDirectory": "C:/Users/Chewy/Documents/GitHub/ryanjoachim/mcp-batchit" } }, "transport": { "type": "stdio", "command": "cmd.exe", "args": [ "/c", "npx", "-y", "@modelcontextprotocol/server-filesystem", "C:/Users/Chewy/Documents/GitHub/ryanjoachim/mcp-batchit" ] } }, "operations": [ { "tool": "create_directory", "arguments": { "path": "C:/Users/Chewy/Documents/GitHub/ryanjoachim/mcp-batchit/memory-bank" } }, { "tool": "write_file", "arguments": { "path": "C:/Users/Chewy/Documents/GitHub/ryanjoachim/mcp-batchit/memory-bank/productContext.md", "content": "# MCP BatchIt Product Context\ \ ## Purpose\ ..." } }, { "tool": "write_file", "arguments": { "path": "C:/Users/Chewy/Documents/GitHub/ryanjoachim/mcp-batchit/memory-bank/systemPatterns.md", "content": "# MCP BatchIt System Patterns\ \ ## Architecture Overview\ ..." } }, { "tool": "write_file", "arguments": { "path": "C:/Users/Chewy/Documents/GitHub/ryanjoachim/mcp-batchit/memory-bank/techContext.md", "content": "# MCP BatchIt Technical Context\ \ ## Technology Stack\ ..." } }, { "tool": "write_file", "arguments": { "path": "C:/Users/Chewy/Documents/GitHub/ryanjoachim/mcp-batchit/memory-bank/progress.md", "content": "# MCP BatchIt Progress Status\ \ ## Completed Features\ ..." } }, { "tool": "write_file", "arguments": { "path": "C:/Users/Chewy/Documents/GitHub/ryanjoachim/mcp-batchit/memory-bank/activeContext.md", "content": "# MCP BatchIt Active Context\ \ ## Current Status\ ..." } } ], "options": { "maxConcurrent": 1, "stopOnError": true, "timeoutMs": 30000 } }
The aggregator processes these operations sequentially (maxConcurrent=1
), creating the directory and writing multiple documentation files. The result array indicates the success/failure status of each operation.
Q1: Do I need multiple aggregator calls if sub-op #2 depends on sub-op #1’s results? Yes. BatchIt doesn’t pass data between sub-ops in the same request. You do multi-phase calls (like the example above).
Q2: Why do I get “Tool create_directory not found” sometimes?
Because your transport
might be pointing to the aggregator script itself instead of the real MCP server. Make sure you reference something like @modelcontextprotocol/server-filesystem
.
Q3: Can I do concurrency plus stopOnError? Absolutely. If a sub-op fails, we skip launching new sub-ops. Already-running ones finish in parallel.
Q4: Does BatchIt re-spawn the target server each time?
It can if you specify keepAlive: false
. But if you use the same exact targetServer.name + transport
, it caches the connection until an idle timeout passes.
Q5: Are partial results returned if an error occurs in the middle?
Yes. Each sub-op that finished prior to the error is included in the final aggregator response, along with the failing sub-op. Remaining sub-ops are skipped if stopOnError
is true.
MIT
Discover shared experiences
Shared threads will appear here, showcasing real-world applications and insights from the community. Check back soon for updates!